i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
When people register as a sex offender the police do monitor them, check to make sure they haven't moved etc. They are not allowed to live near schools etc. Their names, pictures, and addresses are published publicly so the community and schools know who they are.
When they move into a neighborhood you are notified, regardless of whether they are on parole or not. Giving parents and other adults a chance to protect children from predators.
Please quit with the lawyeresque posts.
i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
Did you read what you just posted? "Registration is not considered part of the parole or probation as individuals who are released following serving their full sentence is still required to register".
Meaning that just because they are no longer on probation they are still monitored under the sex offenders registry. It just means probation and parole aren't monitoring. The sex offenders still have to register with the local police.
i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
Please note where it says they were not registered sex offenders or under other types of law enforcement scrutiny.
i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
We must not be looking at the same DOJ report, but I guess
Its your lie, tell it the way you want to.
i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
I believe your DOJ statistics don't tell the whole story of what the report actually said. If you examine it carefully it states those statistics are for sex offenders that are being actively monitored by law enforcement or on sex offender registries so that parents and schools know these people should not be around children.
If Jehovah's Witnesses would just allow the authorities to take care of abuse issues, they would not have the problems they do.
edited to add: recidivism rates only include the number of times someone got caught reoffending.
this "world event" is a few years away but i'm in the field so i work everyday to prepare for it.. our technology is advancing at an exponential rate.
shit will hit the fan because of it.. even as a jw i knew this was coming.
in fact, i thought that's what the bible was talking about.
Maybe you need a hobby to shift your focus...............
jehovah's witnesses officials always tells that once we dedicated our lives to god, we need to do his will till the 'end' of the system or end of our life.. and they always quote the scripture eccl 5:5.. then, what about the properties worldwide?
kingdom halls, buildings in new york 97columbia heights, hotel margaret, head quarter buildings in brooklyn and many properties once they dedicated to god but now they are freely selling the properties.
once dedicated to god, the properties became god's.. if we consider samson's example, judges 13:5 stating about samson that "no razor shall come on his head; .
i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
The problem is the organization knew the molester had a propensity to molest and did nothing to stop it. Please see my last comment which you conveniently skipped over.
The organization can't be liable for abuse they didn't know was happening, but every case in the ARC was documented by the Watchtower organization - so it was known to them, and they did nothing to stop it.
i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
From my standpoint the organization is not going to be able to stop abuse they don't know about.
But once they are aware, they are either going to stop it by reporting it or be complicit in allowing it to continue. They have shown in the past, being complicit in allowing it to continue.
Obviously there is a record of the abuse in the ARC findings so the organization knew about the abuse, even familial.
i have been doing research on the arc as some people on here have suggested.
i find it interesting on the case file analysis some of the findings.
it looks like queensland and new south wales had the biggest problems with this.
I do not want your sympathy. I want you to understand these acts are being committed against real children, who are forever affected by it. If abuse can be stopped from occurring or from occurring again - it needs to be stopped.
You are missing my point regardless of who is abusing a child - if an organization has information that could stop the abuse or stop it from happening to other members of the household, or to the same child again, they need to treat it as a CRIME, not a sin. Let professional investigate and prosecute.
